← SES-102 — Requirement Traceability and Conformance Matrix · Standard Index · SES-104 — Future Implementation Gap Matrix →
Status: Draft 1.0 — Forward-looking specification and gap analysis.
This document is not a reverse-engineering report and is not a claim that the reference implementation already satisfies every requirement. It defines the target architecture for a production-grade, provider-neutral Semantic Execution System (SES), identifies the capabilities that remain to be specified or developed, and gives concrete acceptance criteria for future implementations.
The reference implementation may be used as an informative experiment, but the standard is the authority. Where the implementation and this specification differ, the implementation is considered incomplete until it is brought into conformance or the standard is deliberately amended.
Normative terms MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, and MAY have their usual standards meaning.
Security conformance MUST assume an active adversary controlling intent, transport data, metadata supplied by untrusted parties, timing, retries, and provider failure conditions.
The future suite MUST cover:
A future security program should go beyond deterministic penetration tests and include continuous fuzzing, property-based security tests, differential attacks against providers, and regression corpus management.
Every discovered security defect MUST become a permanent regression vector with a stable identifier and an explanation of the violated invariant.
← SES-102 — Requirement Traceability and Conformance Matrix · Standard Index · SES-104 — Future Implementation Gap Matrix →